(Finance) – We often hear that the relaunch of the country passes through the relaunch of the South. Ua flag-declaration of all the governments that have exchanged hands in recent years. However, net of the proclamations, the fact is that the South is unable to fill the accumulated gap and the situation is alarming to say the least.
Even if only 205,000 units, at national level the number of pensions paid to Italians (equal to 22 million and 759 thousand checks) exceeded the audience made up of self-employed workers and employees employed in factories, offices and shops (22 million 554 thousand employees). The data refer to 1 January 2022. The most “unbalanced” situation occurs in the South. If in the Centre-North – with the exceptions of Liguria, Umbria and Marche – active workers, even if only slightly, are more numerous than the pensions paid by INPS and other social security institutions, in the South the overtaking has already taken place: the latter , in fact, exceed the first one million and 244 thousand units. To say it is the Research Office of the CGIA.
At the territorial level – explain the craftsmen from Mestre – all the regions of the South have a lower number of employed people than the number of pension checks paid out. In absolute terms, the most “unbalanced” situations occur in Campania (balance equal to -226 thousand), Calabria (-234 thousand), Puglia (-276 thousand) and Sicily (-340 thousand). In the Centre-North, on the other hand, only Marche (-36 thousand), Umbria (-47 thousand) and Liguria (-71 thousand) present a critical situation. On the other hand, all the others are of the opposite sign: the most “virtuous” situations – i.e. where active workers are significantly higher than the pensions paid – can be seen in Emilia Romagna (+191 thousand), Veneto (+291 thousand) and Lombardy (+ 658 thousand).
Finally, at the provincial level, the most compromised situations recorded in the North concern Biella (-14 thousand), Savona (-18 thousand) and Genoa (-38 thousand). Among the most virtuous realities, however, we see Bergamo (+83 thousand), Brescia (+111 thousand) and Milan (+299 thousand).
In the Centre, the difficulties of Macerata (-14 thousand), Terni (-22 thousand) and Perugia (-24 thousand) stand out, while the result referring to the province of Rome (+275 thousand) stands out from the positive balance. Finally, in the South, the most unbalanced situations concern Palermo (-80 thousand), Reggio Calabria (-86 thousand), Messina (-94 thousand), Lecce (-104 thousand) and Naples (-137 thousand). Of all the 38 provincial realities in the South, only two have a positive balance: Ragusa (+8,000) and Cagliari (+10,000)
Generally speaking, anywaythe reasons for this gap between workers and the number of pensions are to be found in the strong drop in the birth rate which has been characterizing our country for at least 30 years. The demographic decline, in fact, has helped to reduce the population of working age and to increase the incidence of the over 65s on the overall population. It should be noted that between 2014 and 2022 the Italian population in the most productive age group (25-44 years) decreased by over one million and 360 thousand units (-2.3 percent).
As for the “anomalous” result of the South, it should be noted that, compared to the other geographical divisions of Italy, the number of employed people is significantly lower. Finally, it should be highlighted that the result of this analysis is certainly underdimensioned; we recall, in fact, that in Italy there are just over one million and 700 thousand employed people who, after retiring, continue, on a voluntary basis, to continue to work in full compliance.
A country with an increasingly elderly population could have serious problems in the coming decades to balance the public accounts, the CGIA underlines again, explaining that especially due to the increase in pension expenditure, pharmaceutical expenditure and that linked to personal care/assistance activities. It should also be noted that with a very widespread presence of over 65s, some important economic sectors could suffer negative repercussions.
With a much lower propensity to spend than the younger population, a society made up predominantly of the elderly risks reducing the turnover of the real estate, transport, fashion and hospitality (HoReCa) markets. Conversely, however, the banks could count on some positive effects; with a greater disposition to save, older people should increase the economic size of their deposits, thus making many credit institutions “happy”.