The New York Times He recently announced that he will file a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, which is OpenAI’s largest investor. announced.
The New York Times, to train the large language models (GPT) that power OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, as part of the lawsuit filed by He claimed that he had copied millions of his articles without permission. The Times wants both companies to be held responsible for billions of dollars in damages within the scope of this lawsuit. Here is an answer to this exact issue with its official blog post today. OpenAIbasically the copyright lawsuit filed “flimsy” claims to be. OpenAI also The New York TimesAs shared by , he expresses the view that training artificial intelligence models (LLM / Large Language Model) using publicly available data on the internet, including news articles, is a fair use. The company, which frequently brings this to the agenda, believes that there is no need to pay individually for the data that is open on the internet and can be easily accessed by everyone.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
This event The New York Times It came on top of an Apple-centered news recently shared by. According to information available by the company, the technology giant apple, own artificial intelligence model he works on $50 million through a multi-year agreement It aims to educate using information / content on news sites. Among the news sites mentioned Condé Nast, NBC News, Vogue, Wired, Vanity Fair, Ars Technica, Glamour, The New Yorker, GQ and more, including Other platforms are expected to be included in the list over time..
As far as it is said, there are those who are cold towards the process, as well as those who are warm about it. Apple definitely needs such data. It is very risky for the technology giant to use data from Google to train its own artificial intelligence model. wants to approach the process in the right way, both ethically and legally. The reason behind this is to avoid such cases.
Of course, this is not the first time this issue has come up. In an open letter signed by more than 8,500 people, it was stated that the technology companies behind artificial intelligence systems centered on large language models such as ChatGPT, Bard and LLaMa, His use of written works without permission and payment is criticized and important steps are requested to be taken here..
“These technologies imitate our language, our stories, our style and our ideas. “Millions of copyrighted books, articles, essays and poems become food for artificial intelligence systems; they are seen as endless meals without a bill.” The authors say that the companies that develop these systems provide publishers with He states that they do not issue licenses and states that they incur losses in this regard.
The authors, who are generally right on this issue, demand that companies developing artificial intelligence and large language models take the following steps:
1. If you want to use our copyrighted materials in your productive artificial intelligence programs, come and get permission first.
2. Compensate authors fairly for past and ongoing use of our work in your productive AI programs.
3. Fairly compensate authors if the use of our works results from artificial intelligence, whether or not the content provided by artificial intelligence systems violates existing laws.
Productive AI systems such as ChatGPT can create surprisingly good articles / articles / poems after given commands, and can also summarize many books. Systems that learn this information through “real” artifacts/data, “copyright / copyright” continues to create controversy.