The lawman Johan Kvart considers it to be a “serious mistake”, and states that it has now been rectified.
– Unfortunately, it has become another task, which is not of the magnitude of the previous mistake, but which is still a task that we are in the process of correcting. It is of course regrettable, he tells SVT Nyheter Skåne.
The victim’s attorney says she is “deeply concerned” about the fact that the district court failed to include the confidentiality mark even in the new version of the judgment.