“Caivano Decree”, ANIEF: from double scoring to institute sizing, the news

School quick mini call Support places only in the regions

(Finance) – From the exceptions to the sizing to be implemented for schools in the South, to the double scoring for teachers for the purposes of requesting mobility up to the allowance for staff for teaching continuity: on the Caivano decree the first and second Palazzo Madama Commissions have made several changes. Many amendments approved, many of them requested by Fratelli d’Italia and indicated by the Anief union.

“As president of the representative trade union organization Anief – said the leader Marcello Pacifico – I reiterate the extreme necessity of ensure the well-being of students and pupils with the stabilization of temporary workers on vacant positions in the de facto workforce, as well as providing a specific allowance for disadvantaged offices to cover the expenses incurred”.

The goal is combat youth hardship and educational poverty. Among the main measures, monitoring thefulfillment of the education obligationwith more significant sanctions for parents who do not take care of their children’s compulsory schooling, therefore, “to contain and prevent dropout phenomena in educational institutions in areas at high risk of abandonment, identified on the basis of data relating to learning fragility, as resulting from the national INVALSI surveys, and expand the training offer of the same educational institutions through the activation of specific projects, even in the extracurricular field, with the possible involvement of the social and institutional actors of the interested territories and also with the involvement active role of Third Sector bodies governed by the code referred to in Legislative Decree 3 July 2017, no. 117”, as well as “enhancing the professionalism of teachers in educational institutions”.

A Government amendment also regarding juvenile crime, where article 4 “intensifies the penalties for the crimes of illegal carrying of weapons and instruments capable of offending, for which no license is permitted” and article 6 modifies “the regulation of juvenile criminal proceedings in matter of precautionary and precautionary measures”. Article 8 introduces an important topic, that of re-education path of the minor. “The new provision provides that in the case of crimes punished with a prison sentence not exceeding a maximum of five years or with a pecuniary penalty, alone or combined with the aforementioned penalty, the public prosecutor may order and notify the minor of a request for early definition of the method”. Just as, in respect of the over twenty-year-old prisoner locked up in a juvenile penal institution for crimes committed as a minor “he may be transferred to a prison institution for adults, if he is responsible for behaviors that cause disturbance of order and safety in the juvenile institution or uses violence or threats or even generates a state of subjugation in other prisoners. The rule also applies to prisoners over the age of eighteen who adopt similar behaviour”, as stated in Article 9.

An important change is also linked to child safety in the digital environmentexpanding the provisions for verifying the age of majority of those who access pornographic sites.

.

tlb-finance