The British media are debating whether the image will be missed by Queen Elizabeth of Britain or whether the bill will fall on taxpayers. The agreement stipulates that the parties will not talk about its content in public.
In Britain, the noise of the prince Andrew’n allegations of sexual offenses do not subside, despite the agreement of the prosecutors Virginia Giuffren was born with. The British media is now speculating on the cost of reconciliation and whose pocket the money is being dug up.
Giuffre claimed compensation from the prince in a civil lawsuit because he said the prince had sexually abused him in 2001. Giuffre was 17 at the time and a minor under U.S. law. He is said to have met the prince, a late businessman convicted of sexual offenses. Jeffrey Epstein through.
An out-of-court settlement reached earlier this week is likely to help Prince Andrew avoid civil litigation. However, according to the British media, it is still possible to take the matter to court, as the agreement has yet to be confirmed within 30 days.
The agreement stipulates that neither party will speak publicly about the terms of the agreement. It is reported that as part of the deal, Prince Andrew will make a “substantial donation” to a charity selected by Giuffre to help victims of human trafficking related to sexual exploitation.
The Queen has contributed millions
Following the settlement, it has been debated in Britain who will pay the amount. Telegraph news estimates that help comes from the prince’s mother, the queen From Elizabeth. Prince Andrew is the Queen’s second eldest son, and has often been dubbed the Queen’s favorite in the media.
According to the Telegraph, the queen has already privately funded her son’s legal costs by millions of pounds. The origin of the prince’s own wealth has long been a mystery, as he receives a quarter of a million pounds a year from the queen as well as a modest naval pension.
If the money comes from official sources instead of the queen’s own pockets, the payers are, in effect, British taxpayers. Law firm Howard Kennedy’s media expert Mark Stephens said in a BBC television interview that the prince must confirm that the money does not come from the people, as it would have wider consequences for the entire royal family.
The agreement does not include an apology
Prince Andrew, 61, was forced to relinquish his military ranks and royal duties because of the uproar that followed the charges. He no longer uses the title HRH, meaning he is not called the Royal Height.
The prince has not been prosecuted and has repeatedly denied all charges. The prince, for example, has said he does not even remember meeting Giuffre at all, even though a joint picture of them has been published several times internationally.
The argument has re-emerged with the agreement, as many have wondered why the prince has then agreed to such a huge sum.
The prince’s lawyers have questioned the authenticity of the picture.
Although an agreement has been reached, the prince has still not apologized, for example. However, the statement says he regrets his connections to Epstein and praises the courage of both Giuffre and other survivors to demand justice for themselves and others. The contract amount is justified as an indication that the prince regrets his connections with Epstein.
British media is raging
The Telegraph estimates that the people see agreeing to an expensive agreement as an admission of guilt. Indeed, the British media has repeatedly called for the prince to withdraw from all publicity.
– A man who is genuinely determined to clear his name of such horrible accusations would have fought his nails and teeth … and if he had won, he would have tried to rebuild his life, Sun Magazine (go to another service) the statement states.
There has been some confusion over Giuffre’s decision to agree to compensation, as he has previously asserted that the case is not about money. In January, his lawyer told at least the Telegraph and the BBC that a monetary agreement alone would probably not be enough if the prince did not plead guilty.
According to Giuffre, now 38 years old, the prince sexually abused him in an area close to Epstein. Ghislaine Maxwellin at home in London, at Epstein’s home in New York, and on Epstein’s private island. Maxwell was convicted last year of several sexual offenses, including trafficking in a minor for the purpose of sexual exploitation.