Winemaker murder trial ends with Crown, defense at odds over accused’s mental state

Bradley House killed Paul Pender — on this the Crown and defense agree.

Advertisement 2

Article content

But was the Hamilton man in his right mind when he stabbed the renowned Niagara winemaker to death outside Pender’s cottage east of Selkirk in Haldimand County in February 2022?

Article content

That is the central issue Superior Court Justice Michael Bordin must decide now that House’s trial for second-degree murder is over.

At the close of the day on Friday, House — who has pleaded not guilty — was placed in handcuffs and escorted from the courtroom in Cayuga by two special constables, bound for the Hamilton-Wentworth Detention Center.

Where the 33-year-old ultimately lands is up to Bordin, who heard the case without a jury.

The accused’s fate depends on whether Bordin accepts the Crown’s restraint that House entered a psychotic state because of the drugs he had taken the day he killed Pender, a stranger whose cottage House had ran to while bleeding from the head.

Advertisement 3

Article content

A drug-induced psychosis would make House guilty for the killing.

House’s defense team says their client should be found not criminally responsible (NCR) because of a mental disorder they allege is schizophrenia, which left House unable to understand what he was doing when he stabbed Pender with a kitchen knife he grabbed moments after entering the cottage .

Should Bordin concur with that theory, House would likely be committed to a correctional treatment facility and be subject to annual evaluations by a provincial review board.

House got to Pender’s cottage around 8 pm on Feb. 3, 2022, after bolting from the Selkirk construction site where he had been working. He ran roughly 1.5 kilometers through a blizzard while not wearing a coat and turned up at the door complaining that a twig was lodged in his ear.

Advertisement 4

Article content

House had been having hallucinations about there being a camera inside his ear and picked up a twig to dislodge it. But by the time he got to the cottage, Pender, his wife, and father-in-law could not see any twig.

Defense lawyer Beth Bromberg said her client was by then in a full-blown psychosis that left him unable to understand his actions.

It was not a “conscious decision” to swing the knife at Pender, Bromberg said.

But Crown attorney Gabe Settimi argued that House chasing Pender out of the cottage and down the road “suggests an intent to harm.”

Pender’s wife, Allison Findlay, hit House with a broom and the assailant also got tangled up in a dog leash as he left the cottage.

But House continued to pursue Pender, fatally stabbing him on a neighbor’s driveway.

Advertisement 5

Article content

“He doesn’t drop the knife,” Settimi said. “He locked in on Paul, for whatever reason, (and) took specific, goal-oriented action.”

Running after Pender does not mean House knew what he was doing, Bromberg countered.

House could not form the intention to kill because his actions were “dissociated” from his thoughts due to the psychosis caused by his schizophrenia, she said.

Drugs or mental disorder?

House, a regular drug user at the time, took cocaine, marijuana and oxycodone — in the form of Percocet tablets — the day he killed Pender, according to a toxicology report introduced during the trial.

But the strength and amount of those drugs remains a mystery.

“We don’t really know how many drugs he had, (but) he was adamant it was the same routine as always,” Bromberg said.

Advertisement 6

Article content

In the Crown’s view, the drugs triggered House’s psychosis.

“It’s the drugs on that day that clicked in and caused this,” Settimi said.

But Bromberg blamed “a disease of the mind unrelated to intoxication,” noting House had exhibited symptoms of schizophrenia — such as seeing visions and believing he was being followed and spied on — earlier in life.

The symptoms continued after he was off narcotics and taking anti-psychotic drugs while incarcerated.

“We’re 20 months out now. If it’s a drug-induced psychosis, he shouldn’t need medication and he shouldn’t have psychosis still,” Bromberg said.

House claims to have no memory of killing Pender, telling the court he “blacked out” shortly after leaving the construction site and only regained his senses when he woke up in a hospital bed.

Advertisement 7

Article content

A skeptical Settimi called House an “unreliable” witness.

“Mr. House’s story is shrouded in a veil of confusion, vagueness and inconsistency,” Settimi said, accusing House of lying on the stand to protect himself from the consequences of his actions.

Bromberg admitted House was a “terrible historian,” but said he was forthright with the psychiatrists who interviewed him and his accounts of his drug use could be trusted, even if the details were fuzzy.

“He’s not lying to anyone. He just has significant learning and memory impairments,” Bromberg said. “I think it’s completely credible that he didn’t remember.”

Generational trauma

Bromberg urged the judge to apply the Gladue principles to this case, due to House being Indigenous from Six Nations of the Grand River.

Advertisement 8

Article content

Most often used during sentencing, Gladue instructs judges to take an Indigenous offender’s background into account through the lens of systemic challenges faced by Indigenous peoples in Canada, such as abuse, poverty, and drug and alcohol addiction.

Bromberg recounted House’s experiences of sexual abuse as a childhood, growing up in poverty with an alcoholic mother and physically abusive father, and having several siblings and cousins ​​die at young ages, all of which left him coping with depression as an adult.

House’s difficult personal history, along with the generational trauma that started when his grandparents met at residential school, “magnifies” his “complex trauma,” Bromberg said.

Bordin noted Indigenous people do not have schizophrenia at higher rates than non-Indigenous people, but Bromberg said the disorder is “linked” to House’s history of trauma.

Advertisement 9

Article content

“It’s all part and parcel of his mental state and mental disorder,” she said.

Settimi acknowledged the need for Gladue in the legal system, but told the judge he was “not certain” how the principles applied to House’s case.

Need for treatment

Committing House to a secure facility where he would receive treatment for schizophrenia, drug addiction and “complex trauma” would be “the best way of protecting the public,” Bromberg said, while asking Bordin to find her client not criminally responsible.

“I hope he can get well. But I don’t think he can do it without treatment,” she said. “Without that treatment, he remains a continuing danger.”

House needs help, Settimi told the judge — but for drug addiction, not a mental disorder.

An offender having delusions and hallucinations, and even a formal schizophrenia diagnosis, does not automatically justify an NCR ruling, the prosecutor noted.

Bordin will give his decision at the Cayuga courthouse on Jan. 3 to 10 a.m.

JP Antonacci is a Local Journalism Initiative Reporter based at the Hamilton Spectator. The initiative is funded by the Government of Canada.

Article content


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to one hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.