Today, an alarming development came up. The United Kingdom puts a back door from Apple to iCloud backups wants.
Surprisingly, this rear door is requested to have a general access permission to all encrypted user contents globally. By default, Apple protects only certain iCloud data with end -to -end encryption. For users for higher encryption and safety “Advanced Data Protection”He needs to activate his feature. Apple conveys in this regard: “Detected setting for your standard data protection account. Your iCloud data is encrypted and encryption switches are protected in Apple data centers. In this way, we can help you with data recovery. In this option, only specific data are encrypted from end to end. Advanced data protection for iCloud is an optional setting that offers our highest safety level for cloud data. If you choose to enable Advanced Data Protection, encryption switches for most of your iCloud data can only be accessed from your trusted devices. Thus, your data is protected using end -to -end encryption. Additional data such as iCloud backup, data in Photos and data in Notes are also maintained. ” Apple is not expected to put a back door on iCloud backups, following the request from the United Kingdom. In response to the decision, the company is in the United Kingdom Advanced Data Protection It is thought to stop presenting.
You may be interested in
The UK had previously gathered many criticism with the online security law. WhatsApp, which reacted the most to this issue, is an open letter that you can read all below. Published: “When we share the things we are working on here, the subject often becomes new features or the products we develop. Today, we write about a troubled development that everyone should know in the UK. The UK government is currently taking into account a new legislation that can forced technology companies to break the end -to -end encryption in private messaging services. This law may give the power to weaken the confidentiality of billions of people around the world, an official who has not come to the election. We think that no company, government or person should have the power to read your personal messages, and we will continue to defend encryption technology. We are proud to be with other technology companies that oppose the problematic parts of this law, which will weaken the safety of people in the United Kingdom and around the world.
Everyone who cares about safety and privacy on the internet. As end -to -end encrypted communication services, we call the United Kingdom to address the risks of the online security law Draft in terms of confidentiality and security of everyone. The government states that its intention is to protect the end -to -end encryption and to obey people’s right to confidentiality. It is not too late to make the Draft Law compatible with this intention. Businesses, individuals and governments around the world are facing endless threats due to online fraud, fraud and data theft. Malicious actors and enemy states routinely challenge the security of our critical infrastructure. End -to -end encryption is one of the most powerful defenses against these threats. Today, the risk has never been so high today, when it has become more dependent on internet technologies in order to carry out the basic activities of vital institutions.
In its current form, this bill can break the end -to -end encryption, and it can shake the possibility of routing the personal messages of friends, relatives, employees, managers, journalists, human rights activists and even politicians themselves by opening the door of exposing them to general and discriminatory surveillance. This bill, which does not provide any open protection for encryption, can disregard the purpose of the end -to -end encryption by giving the power to compulsate the proactively scanning of private messages in the end -to -end communication services, if applied as it is written as it is written. In short, this draft law encourages enemy governments to prepare imitation laws, while pose an unprecedented threat to the privacy, security and security of all the United Kingdom citizens and the people they communicate with all over the world.
On the one hand, supporters say that they appreciate the importance of encryption and confidentiality, while on the other hand, they claim that it is possible to watch everyone’s messages without shaking the end -to -end encryption. However, this is not possible. We are not the only worries about the United Kingdom’s bill. The United Nations warned that the United Kingdom government’s efforts to impose back door requirements were “a paradigm change that causes serious problems that may have terrible consequences”. Even the United Kingdom government accepted the risks of the privacy of the draft bill, but the “intention” Draft Draft is not interpreted in this way.
Global providers of end -to -end encrypted products and services cannot weaken the safety of products and services in line with the requests of certain governments. It is not possible to have a thing called “British Internet veya or from a special end to the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom Government should take this Draft Law urgently on the table; Companies should encourage them to provide more privacy and security to those living in the country. The way we need to follow is not to weaken the encryption, to shake privacy and to expose people’s special communication to collective surveillance. ”