The result was astonishing! Artificial intelligence turned out to be unexpectedly good at this job as well.

The result was astonishing Artificial intelligence turned out to be

ChatGPT, a new version of OpenAI’s artificial intelligence-powered chatbot, has been talked about a lot on social media in the past weeks. However, a new one has been added to the news about ChatGPT, which can talk to people, answer questions, write code and translate. Beatrice Nolan from Business Insider experimented with an interesting letter of intent with an AI-powered chatbot and came to a rather surprising result.

WRITTEN A LETTER OF INTENT TO CHATGPT

According to the news he prepared, Nolan decided to test the usefulness of ChatGPT in this area, saying, “I wanted to see if artificial intelligence was useful in applying for a job, which is one of the most boring tasks in life.” For this, Nolan entered some real job descriptions and untrue experience information into ChatGPT, and then sent the “letters of intent” created by ChatGPT to experts to see what they thought.

Two of the experts who looked at the AI-generated printouts noted that they looked like they were written by real candidates.

“WE THINK THIS WAS WRITTEN BY A REAL CANDIDATE”

Chris Willsher, an expert at UK recruitment firm Reed, said: “We’d probably think it was written by a real candidate and then we’d interview.”

However, while everything seemed fine, it wasn’t perfect. Because Willsher continued, “The letter is well structured, but lacks some details about the company they are applying to.” said.

Stephanie Petry, a “talent scout” at software company Jobber, agreed that ChatGPT’s application for the accountant position was pretty good. Petry showed that he liked the article, saying, “I’ll probably send the candidate to the next round so I can get a better idea of ​​him.”

However, Petry did not like another letter of intent written for the social media assistant so much. “The writing style is not what I would expect from someone in that role,” said Petry. “The tone is very formal and tasteless, I expected them to show more creativity and character.” used the phrases.

Both Willsher and Petry said the letters lack personality and corporate research.

Petry adds, “They lack character and seem so formal and professional that I’d like to get to know the person a little more.” he said.

mn-3-tech