The whistles of the Swedish judges rose to the spotlight after the World Cup final. According to Swedish experts, the game was settled by two wrong penalties.
The judging of the World Hockey Finals has been highlighted in Sweden and Canada. A pair of Swedish judges sparked a razor in the final Mikael Nord-Linus Öhlund action when there were three questionable situations in the match.
Wallpaper rose Sakari Mannisen before the winning goal Thomas Chabotin hooked before the lions ’opening goals Cole Sillinger cool off the high racket and the rejection-acceptance saga seen at the end of the third installment after the Canadian hit.
Sillinger got a cool racket, though Miro Heiskasen Heiskanen’s own racket hit his face. Thanks to Sillinger’s cold, Finland joined the game and took the lead Mikael Granlundin with superior paints. At the end of the third round, the judge first dismissed the Canadian 2-3 reduction, but approved it after a video review.
According to Canadians and Swedes, Björninen filmed
– It is clear that the racket was between the legs, but it was not nice to see what Björninen did at the end. He emphasized the situation, an expert from TV6 Mattias Norström comments on the situation according to Aftonbladet.
– A judge who would have had authority would have noticed a Finnish filmmaker Aftonbladet Marcus Leifby stated.
“Two clear wrong verdicts settle World Cup final”
SVT’s expert Jonas Anderssonin according to two clear wrong verdicts were seen when Björninen obtained the punishment and Heiskanen ‘s own bat hit in the face.
– Looking at the recurrence of the situation, it is clear that Björninen is filming. Canada was unfortunate because there were two clear wrong verdicts there. I think these things settled the World Cup final, Andersson said.
Also a columnist for Aftobladet Mats Wennerholm Wondered that Canada got cold when Heiskanen ‘s own bat hit a Finn in the face.
– That might have settled the match, Wennerholm said.
– It shouldn’t have cooled down. The judges could have watched the situation in a video, TV6 expert Norström saw.
The Canadian 2-3 reduction paint went through because the paint can be accepted if the disc clearly goes in between the pole lines, even if the paint has moved out of place. Then why did the judge show the goal rejection even before he went to check the video? Perhaps accidentally, and then immediately pulled away the rejection. On the other hand if Jukka Jalonen challenged the verdict and the challenge did not pass, should Finland have become cold?
– Why Finland was not allowed to cool down after a wrong challenge, SVT expert Andersson wondered.
– They said the coach didn’t challenge. It was really weird and I didn’t understand this. The goal was quite clear.
Disappointment shone in the Canadian team’s comments
In the Canadian camp, emotions became hot about the judgments and the outcome after the game.
– It sucks to lose extra time in the cold, which … It sucks. With so much work to do and the game solving that way, it sucks, the Canadian star of the World Cup Pierre-Luc Dubois repeated after the game on the TSN website.
According to Chabot, who had been hooked, it was clear that Björninen had fallen in his own time.
– However, I put my racket there and put myself in that situation. I think everyone agrees that he did a little film, Canadian Captain Chabot said.
Björninen commented on the situation for Helsingin Sanomat. He considered the situation completely normal.
– There was a lot of movement, cross-movement and relocation. The opponent’s racket was caught between the legs, there was nothing more miraculous about it. There was nothing to do. It’s a normal situation, Björninen told HS.