South Africa files new application before ICJ against Israel

Uganda disapproves of the vote of its judge Julia Sebutinde

South Africa announced on Tuesday that it had filed a new appeal with the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the highest judicial body of the UN, to urgently examine Israel’s announcement of an upcoming military offensive. on Rafah and opposes if necessary “ a new violation of rights “.

2 mins

For South Africa, the latest developments in the band Gaza and the threat of a massive operation on Rafah are in contradiction with the provisional measures decided by the Court, and with the Genocide Convention ratified by Israelpoints out our correspondent in Johannesburg, Claire Bargelès. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently ordered his army to prepare an offensive on Rafah, the last refuge for 1.4 million Palestinians, according to the UN, or more than half of the total population of the Gaza Strip, the most having fled the war which has been raging for four months. International pressure has since intensified for a truce agreement between Israel and the Islamist movement Hamas.

Pretoria had already filed a first complaint before the highest court of the UN, asking it to rule on possible acts of genocide. The decision may not be known for years, but the court demanded in Tel Aviv last month that it do everything in its power to prevent such acts.

Risk of intensification “ massacres »

Pretoria said it had filed an urgent appeal on Monday with the ICJ, which sits in The Hague. From now on, the South African presidency emphasizes the risk of seeing an intensification ” massacres, injuries and destruction on a large scale » and hopes that the judges will take new emergency measures. According to the South African government, this “ would constitute a serious and irreparable violation of the Genocide Convention “. “ South Africa is confident that this issue will be addressed with the necessary urgency given the daily number of deaths in Gaza », adds Pretoria.

However, although the Court’s decisions are binding, they do not have coercive means, and possible UN Security Council sanctions could be blocked by the United States.

(With AFP)

rf-5-general