(Finance) – The Court of Cassationwith the sentence obtained by Anief lawyers, notes that the EU Court of Justice intervened in the same matter with a new ruling (30.11.2023, in case C-270/22), with which it established that: “Clause 4 must be interpreted in the sense that: it precludes a national legislation which, for the purposes of recognizing a worker’s seniority at the time of his appointment as a permanent public employee, excludes periods of service provided under fixed-term employment contracts which do not reach 180 days in a year school or are not carried out continuously from 1 February until the end of the final counting operations, regardless of the actual number of hours worked, and limits the calculation of periods that reach these thresholds and that exceed four years to two thirds, subject to recovery of the remaining third after a certain number of years of service”.
By applying these principles, the Court of Appeal of Bologna recognized the appellant Anief 4,496 euros as salary differences.