“Sad how far Twitch has fallen” – Clip with 38 million views is seen as a new low

On December 18th, a clip from Twitch streamer firedancer went viral on the social network Twitter/X. The streamer used censorship bars to cover private parts of her body. The clip sparked an outcry on social media. It’s apparently a reference to the zigzag nature of Twitch’s rules on nudity. The topic has dominated the discussion on the former gaming platform for 3 years.

What was that clip?

  • The clip originally appeared on Twitch itself and received around 400,000 views there.
  • But it spread virally on the Twitter account of the US site Dexerto, which closely follows Twitch: The clip received 38 million views on Twitter.
  • The clip shows a woman covering her seemingly naked body with censorship bars while laughing. The clip is described as “the new meta” of Twitch. As you can see in other clips, this is just a gag: the woman is actually wearing clothes under the censorship bars.
  • We explain the background to the clip.

    Recommended editorial content

    At this point you will find external content from Twitch that complements the article.

    View Twitch content

    I agree to external content being displayed to me. Personal data may be transmitted to third-party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.

    “The new Twitch meta”

    This is the conflict over nudity on Twitch: For many years, before 2020, there were heated discussions about nudity on Twitch: Bans for nudity were more common at the time and it was not clear to the banned streamers exactly where Twitch drew the line between “This is artistic cosplay and okay” and “Someone is showing too much thigh and needs to be banned,” draws.

    Female streamers said, for example: They were only banned because of their big breasts; if they had a different figure, the outfit they were wearing would be completely okay. But they would be banned on Twitch for an outfit that they could easily wear around town.

    People wanted clear rules.

    In 2020, Twitch actually issued these clear rules about the extent to which nudity is allowed on Twitch and what is prohibited. Roughly you can say:

  • If nudity occurs “naturally” and is socially permitted, then it is okay: If you go to the beach, you can wear a bikini.
  • However, if nudity is sexualized, then it is critical and can lead to a ban if, for example, the butt or breasts are the focus of the camera.
  • However, this rule was quickly reduced to absurdity by streamers like Amouranth because they simply put a bathtub in the living room and said: “I bathe, so I can wear a bikini.”

    As a result, there was frequent criticism of Twitch that they were “too lax in banning” nudity towards women:

  • In December 2020, a streamer allegedly mistakenly showed herself completely naked on Twitch and only received a 3-day ban.
  • In contrast, the tenor is that male streamers would be punished much more harshly, even if they only did seemingly trivial things like graphically depicting sexual acts:
  • Conflict over streamer causes Twitch to relax the rules

    This was the latest development: A few days ago, Twitch suddenly allowed “artistic nudity” and also the targeted highlighting of breasts, buttocks or pelvis. According to Twitch, the rule change was made based on feedback from streamers.

    The reason for the change was apparently this clip from streamer Morganpie: The clip suggested nudity without actually violating Twitch’s rules.

    Recommended editorial content

    At this point you will find external content from Twitter that complements the article.

    View Twitter content

    I agree to external content being displayed to me. Personal data may be transmitted to third-party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.

    But this new regulation was immediately used to draw naked anime characters in the “Art” category, focusing primarily on the genitals (via gamestar).

    Just a few days later, on December 15th, Twitch withdrew this rule change and said that they had gone “too far” (via twitch).

    That was the clip: In this climate, Firedancer’s clip about the new “Twitch meta” appeared, which apparently wanted to test the limits of the current regulations.

    Here you can see that the streamer Firedancer was actually wearing clothes under the censorship bars:

    Recommended editorial content

    At this point you will find external content from Twitch that complements the article.

    View Twitch content

    I agree to external content being displayed to me. Personal data may be transmitted to third-party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.

    What are the reactions to the clip? The reactions to the clip on reddit are rather cynical and amused, but on Twitter in particular, many are rather hostile:

  • People write: This is a new low for Twitch. The platform couldn’t become any more “trash”.
  • Now 10 to 13 year old children are probably Twitch’s main target group.
  • “It’s sad how far Twitch has fallen.”
  • But while some streamers are currently testing the limits of Twitch, others are now using artificial intelligence and bots from which viewers can receive messages and photos. MMORPG streamer Asmongold recently responded to such an example in the stream:

    Twitch streamer discovers how revealing women are now making money in a modern, creepy way

    mmod-game