According to the complaining judge, the privacy of the detainees was wrongfully violated and they should have been involved in the recordings beforehand. Good news for Van Soest and his clients; the summary proceedings do not have to proceed. Still, he has a bad aftertaste about the issue. “I honestly do not understand how they could have done this. That no one within that organization thinks: we also serve the interests of the detainees. You are a prison director, you should just know that you do not approach this.”