(Finance) – Come on Option Woman the Government “has put something on the table, an initial intention to modify the law they have used in the manoeuvre. They are working to modify the current approach, but it is not specified whether it is a further modification or its restoration”. The leader of the Uil made it known, Pierpaolo Bombardieri, at the end of the meeting at the Ministry of Labour. “The Government has undertaken to amend the current law and to give us an answer in the next few hours or days – he added -. The Ministry of Labor and the MEF are discussing each other and, therefore, we are waiting to hear some news. But we don’t know about what kind of openness it is. We need to move from declarations to facts”.
The meeting revealed that, in addition to the Women’s Option, for the reform overall of pensions, the government is considering extending i four months in advance for each child (already envisaged by the Dini reform only for those who are in the full contributory system) to all forms of pension for women. Four months in advance would be equivalent to 700 million spent in addition, the unions explained, adding that evaluations are underway between Labor technicians and the Mef.
For Christian Ferrarifederal secretary of the CGIL, it was an “absolutely interim meeting”, in which “we had no answers, starting with the first one we raised at the first meeting, which was the reset signal for Option Donna”. “Not because we believe that that is a solution – she explained – but because it is the starting point for making a path credible, which puts the women today at the center of this table at the center”.
Meanwhile, added the exponent of the CGIL, “a series of points and titles have been lined up to think about with respect to the condition youth and of women. But we are still in the stage of interlocution. We have raised another issue with respect to the condition of youth: in addition to measures social security which will hopefully be discussed, it is essential to keep the job market starting with a contrast to the precariousness which is the real cause of the critical retirement perspective for young people”.
“We said that with i voucher introduced in the finance law and with the hypothesis that there is discussion of returning to the full liberalization of the fixed-term relationship, we are going exactly in the opposite direction”, specified Ferrari. “Precisely because of the impact it also has on the pension plan, it is necessary to reverse the trend and fight precariousness – he concluded -. There is a need to expand the basis contributory: the first lever is the salary, a stable job”.