The two-goal-leadershipers failed to keep Lithuania behind, but eventually bent in a draw in the World Cup qualifying against Lithuania.
The Finnish men’s football team lost their two goals and ended up in a 2-2 draw in the World Cup qualifying match against Lithuania.
The steady execution was also exhausted on the Kaunas evening. In the second half, the passivation became Finland’s fate, although the team managed to significantly improve the first Malta match in the qualifying window.
– The result is a disappointment. If you think it’s in a 2-0 lead in a match where the Huuhkajat got clearly more goals than the opponent then the time for sour taste was, Sports Expert Miika Nuutinen summed up.
Finland’s head coach in his second match Jacob Friis After the match gave glory to Lithuania and especially the team’s handicap goal Gvidas to the ginitis.
Finland’s leadership was close to ten minutes before the decision when Benjamin Källman got a great bump. In the end, Finland managed to score three goals in the first two World Cup qualifiers.
Friis does not see scoring as the team’s current problem. According to the Danish pilot, paint efficiency could be better, but much worse.
– I think we did many things right. But this is football. The kind of goal they did. Our players did good things on the field, so this was a good performance for us, but not such a good result, Friis said.
– We were in trouble in the first game, but we’re on a good road, Friis summed up.
The beginning of the first half was the celebration of Finland. The Huuhkajat played great and scored the ball twice in Lithuania.
The Huuhkajan paint account opened Kaan Kairinenwhen the match was just over three minutes behind. At the same time, the goal was Kairinen’s first men’s national team level.
– Of course we had a pretty good start to the match. It was long avoided that Lithuania could not reach dangerous goals and could have scored a third goal that could have sealed the game. After 2-2, we were no longer able to make the final race, Kairinen described.
The midfielder was especially pleased with the Finnish ball game, and after a weak Malta match, Finland succeeded in his planned relief movement.
In the opening half, Finland was clearly able to improve the Malta match for midfield and defense. Changes were also made to the opening line Daniel Håkans, Robin Lod and Gle’s chamber.
17 in the game Joel Pohjanpalo The penalty kick already took Finland to a 2-0 lead. The situation was made by Håkans’ strong exploitation, as a result of which Lithuanians tackled him.
Lithuania got his first shot from afar towards the goal after about 28 minutes of the game. Ten minutes of it and the top player Armandas Kucys He was able to tinue from the front corner Lithuania.
To the other half, Lithuania brought changes to their game by lowering their other midfielders and forcing Finns to run long distances. Finland failed to create a threat like an opening half and eventually missed the other half without a goal.
The Finnish balance in the G-block is four points in the first two World Cup qualifiers. The winners of the blocks go directly to the World Cup. The block two progress to the qualifying round. Malta, Poland and the Netherlands also play in the same qualifier as Finland.