If it is up to the Public Prosecution Service, the father does not have to pay compensation, because it is not demonstrable that he instructed his son. “It seems to have come about due to circumstances, the weapon was not equalized, the boy carried it more often, there was no intention or plan to kill the injured man or the others,” said the officer.
OM demands youth detention and acquittal for suspects shooting Julianapark Utrecht, long-running conflict not yet resolved
