Niklas Wikegård’s huge disappointment over the pictures in the SHL – now appeals to Swedish hockey: “Why do you do that?”

A match penalty was awarded in HV71-Färjestad.
Then Niklas Wikegård understood nothing.
– Why do you do that?, says the expert with enormous disappointment.

It was in the second period of the meeting in Jönköping between HV71 and Färjestad that the judges made a decision that would stir up a lot of emotions among TV4’s experts. It all started with a tripping expulsion on FBK’s Patrik Lundh, but Victor Ejdsell continued to play, and fired a shot at HV goalkeeper Joni Ortio.

Big disappointment

Tommi Tikka didn’t like that, who chose to put his foot down against Ejdsell. Both ended up in a brawl, but no punches were thrown. But after holding each other for a long time, the judges chose to break and go in between. Then the referees on the ice chose to give both players a match penalty for fighting plus 20 minutes of game misconduct.

230921 Fight between Färjestad’s Victor Ejdsell and HV71’s Tommi Tikka during the SHL ice hockey match between HV71 and Färjestad on September 21, 2023 in Jönköping. Photo: Carl Sandin / BILDBYRÅN

Victor Ejdsell, one of Färjestad’s main offensive weapons, with three points in the opening three games, was visibly upset and shouted at the referees for a long time. And there were upset faces in TV4’s studio as well, where experts Niklas Wikegård and Almen were furious at the verdict.

– I think it’s no, no, no, no, says Bibic during the broadcast.

READ MORE: Johan Garpenlöv rages and now wants to see clear change in Swedish hockey: “It’s humiliating”

Wikegård’s criticism

Niklas Wikegård was in agreement, to say the least, and he also had difficulty finding backing for the decision in the rule book.

– Why? Yes, but why do the judges make such a decision? It’s not even a fight. Me and Björn (Oldeen, presenter TV4 reds.anm) sit here and shake our heads and just think: Well, please, dear, it’s a hug party. Calling it a fight… Why do you do that?, he says.

230302 Cmore’s expert Niklas Wikegård and Johan Edlund during the ice hockey match in the SHL between Skellefteå and Luleå on March 2, 2023 in Skellefteå. Photo: Ola Westerberg / BILDBYRÅN

Almen Bibic said that it may have been pure frustration for the judges that the “hugging party” went on for so long, and that it was difficult for the judges to step in and interrupt the two heavyweights.

– I don’t know if it’s an annoyance, that you stand there for quite a long time and maybe ask the players to stop but they continue? It could be, otherwise I don’t really have a good explanation for it, he says.

The league’s referee base, Tomas Thorsbrink, has said after the match that there is backing for the decision according to the rulebook.

Do you agree with the experts on this? Or were the judges right? Share the article or leave a comment on Facebook to say what you think!

READ MORE: Patric Hörnqvist ready for a prestigious job in the NHL after a tough finish – highly praised by the club manager: “Deeply grateful”

spbln-sports