(Finance) – Overall industrial policy that enhances the second Italian manufacture by number of employees, with the adoption of interventions to support companies and investments in our country; Reform and refinancing of social safety nets, including all workers in the sector; Attention to supply chain and sustainability policies, which consider legality, health and safety as priority elements; Direct and constant commitment of the Ministry of Companies and Made in Italy on individual crisis tables; Permanent table to agree on any corrective actions, which starting from cases of deindustrialisation of districts, evaluates concrete acts to counter the phenomenon: they are The five points proposed by Filctem Cgil, Femca Cisl, Uiltec Uil at the fashion table, which was held today at Mimit.
It is also necessary – the unions continue – an intervention on energy policies and a substantial reinterpretation of the regulations in support of Made in Italy. Companies incentives should be easy and quick to access, support the development of business processes and encourage the professional growth of sector employees, in the face of specific conditionality related to the maintenance of good and stable employment.
Regarding the New model of management of trade union disputesannounced by Mimit – declare the trade union organizations – we believe that the decision to decentralize it and regional level in the case of companies up to 250 employees cannot be shared. Eshing yourself to one’s role of government and national direction, in such a delicate moment for the industrial system of our country, is a serious choice, which downloads the coordination on disputes in companies often of a transnational nature on the regions.
The entire manufacturing sector, the second of Europe, – concludes the note – has long manifested great difficulties, made evident, in the last two decades, by a massive appeal to ordinary and extraordinary social safety nets, both in the industrial and artisan sector and SMEs. Imprier to support the income of employees are not enough Which, in addition to being insufficient (see the recent DL 160/24), do not reflect a systemic resumption perspective or a serious industrial policy.