Maneuver, Ape Donna hypothesis: go with a lower age

Maneuver Ape Donna hypothesis go with a lower age

(Finance) – Among the modification hypotheses of the social security system in Budget law tick the social bee facilitated for women with the possibility of receiving the accompanying allowance towards retirement starting from 61/62 years instead of the expected 63 currently. According to what we learn, the introduction of a further advantage in the contribution to access the measure in favor of women with ato an uncomfortable situation: fired, with at least a disability 74%, caregivers or engaged in demanding jobs.

This would add to the discount already in force for one year for each child, possible for up to a maximum of two years. To access the measure you must have accrued 30 years of contributions in the case of fired people, with a disability of at least 74% and care givers which drops to 28 for women with two children. In the case of workers engaged in demanding jobs (for at least six years in the last seven or seven years in the last 10 years of work) the years of contributions required are 36 and drop to 34 for workers with two children. The allowance paid by INPS for 12 months a year (not 13 like the pension) is equal to the amount of the monthly pension installment calculated at the time of accessing the measure.

The subsidy which is paid until access to the old-age pension, however, cannot exceed 1,500 euros gross per month, non-revaluable. There measure it could be an alternative to the Woman option or be introduced in addition to this. At the moment the audience would essentially be there itself (laid off workers, care givers, etc.) but in the case of Ape Donna it would not have been forced to opt for the completely contributory calculation method.

He would retireand after (now with the woman option having two children you can leave at 58 in addition to a one-year rolling window if employed) and you would have an allowance that can reach a maximum of 1,500 euros gross. A significantly lower number of years of contributions would be required (between 28 and 30 instead of 35) but this would not be pension, there would only be a measure to accompany the pension.

tlb-finance