Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3, which was released into early access last week and was reviewed and written about by many game industry media, did not receive generally positive comments. It was stated that the quality of the series was not present in the game, and the game was found to be “mediocre”. This is because, Bloomberg veteran journalist Jason Schreier It was announced by. Jason Schreier, who said that the game was not good because it was developed quickly, also detailed what he knew about the subject and conveyed the game to the public.
Why Is Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 Not at the Expected Level?
Jason Schreier, who made a statement on his official Twitter (X) account at midnight, shared the news he made on Bloomberg about Cod Modern Warfare 3 with his followers. Why Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 isn’t good enough Citing the rapid development of the game as the main reason, Jason Schreier said the following about the game:
“Most Call of Duty games are developed over about three years. However The making of Modern Warfare 3 It was completed in less than a year and a half, which helps explain the bad reviews. Staff worked nights and weekends to finish the game.
Modern Warfare 3 to fill a gap in Call of Duty’s release schedule was designed. For several months, many developers believed this would be an expansion, but Activision insists that was never the case. This story goes into the development process of the game…”
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 System Requirements You can also take a look here.
What Did Players Say About CoD Modern Warfare 3?
The information and statements made by the famous journalist Jason Schreier about CoD Modern Warfare III angered the fans of the series. Game out early And to take a look at the reactions of gamers on social media to Activision, which sells it for the same price as the main games:
“Cold War“It’s much better than Call of Duty Modern Warfare III Campaign, I wish I hadn’t bought it, it would have been a waste.”
“Why do you sell the game you developed in 3 years for the same price as the game you developed in 1.5 years? We pay the same money and get more play bad games Do we have to? Are the players assholes?
“The players did not expect this game to arrive in 1.5 years; making a decent game He had expectations. “If they had released it again in 3 years and produced a decent game.”
Latest game news You can take a look here.
“Multipayer sections They added it to the story mode It’s like. There is no innovation, they didn’t care because they thought it would sell anyway. The previous game was much better than this one…”
“They should have sold it at half price then! Selling DLCs at normal game price These game companies have gotten used to it. Separate money for each package, separate fee for each add-on, more money for each mode… The result of such a focus on money will be bad gameplay and ultimately loss of players!”
“They are literally trying to destroy a production that shouldn’t even have DLC. Where is the first game, where is the second game?… There is a huge difference between them. Nonsense weapon free missions, characters not having any ties, and doing things in this game that they couldn’t do in the second game under the name of an unexpected ending, etc.”