In Los Angeles, plants and fungi decontaminate the soil at a lower cost

The 68-year-old volunteer marvels at the cleaning power of this bush dotted with white and pink flowers.

“It’s the miracle of life“, enthuses the pensioner behind his filter mask. “Plants really know how to do this job, they’ve done it plenty of times over millions of years.“.

On this land long covered in concrete, scientists from UC Riverside University have disseminated carefully chosen plants and fungi, with the hope of naturally eliminating the heavy metals and petrochemicals that have contaminated the neighborhood for decades.

This technique, known as “bioremediation”, represents a much more economical alternative to the usual processes.

“The conventional method of cleaning up sites is to dig up all the contaminated soil and dump it somewhere else“, reminds AFP the researcher Danielle Stevenson, who is leading this life-size study. “Very expensive”, this approach often runs “in the millions” and “just moves the problem elsewhere“.

On the other hand, this mycologist’s project, carried out on three different former industrial sites in Los Angeles, costs only “$200,000“. And according to her, the first results are promising.

“Vacuum cleaners” and “decomposers”

“In three months we cut petrochemicals by 50% and in six months we got closer (to that threshold) for some metals“, she relates.

The scientist chose her anti-pollution weapons carefully.

On one side, oyster mushroom whites have been integrated into the ground because they are mushrooms “decomposers“: their underground part, called “mycelium“, feeds on both dead trees and hydrocarbons such as diesel.

“This is because they are essentially the same thing“, explains the thirty-something. “Much of our fossil fuels are just dead materials that have been compressed over long periods of time“.

On the other hand, several local California plants act as “vacuum cleaners” for heavy metals — which can then be reused. To survive in hostile soil, they receive help from mycorrhizal fungi, natural allies of the forest which provide them with water and nutrients in particular.

In this popular neighborhood with a Latin American majority, Ms. Stevenson wants to bring the concentrations of pollutants below the health thresholds set by the American authorities. Because living near former contaminated industrial sites “literally reduces life expectancy“.

Historically, the polluters are rarely the payers. After the departure of the companies, cleaning is often the responsibility of the communities, which take years to find the necessary funding.

In the United States, where the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies nearly 1,900 problematic sites, the depollution projects carried out each year can be counted on the fingers of one hand, according to the scientist.

Proposing a “cheaper” method would allow “more sites to be cleaned up more quickly”, she hopes.

Anti-fungi prejudices

Cleaning wastewater, remediation of soil contaminated by toxic ash from forest fires, frequent in California… “Bioremediation” can be applied to many areas, according to her.

But then, why is this technique still so underdeveloped?

“Bioremediation is still considered risky“, explains Bill Mohn, professor of microbiology at the University of British Columbia, Canada. Unlike the excavation of soil, “it is difficult to systematically guarantee that we will fall below the required levels of pollutants“.

An uncertainty reinforced by the lack of funding for research, in a field that has no concrete product to sell, he adds.

Stigma against unhealthy mushrooms also dies hard, says Stevenson.

“I am always asked if, by introducing a fungus to clean a site, it will not take over, infect the house and spread everywhere“, she says.

Hence the importance of conducting this type of study in real conditions, and not just in the laboratory, in order to test the viability of this natural approach.

“Once we have more field testing of these methods, people will feel more confident.“, says the researcher.