Never in history has feminism played so much against women and their rights. This is the paradox these days: there is not a debate, a nomination, a news item, the release of a book or a film, an exhibition where feminist speech is not invited, and yet never Women have never seemed so obliterated by essentialization, by infantilization, by incoherence. THE woman has become the alpha and the omega of any analysis, of any position taken, right up to the absurd: thus Elisabeth Borne cannot be resigned because she is a woman; what does it matter if Yaël Braun-Pivet, the first woman President of the National Assembly, is against assimilation (which has made it possible, I remind you for the distracted, to free exiles from the weight of exile and to integrate them into French society), it is above all a sex before being an individual with political convictions – which no one else knows; what does it matter, on the other hand, that Marine Le Pen is a woman who has twice reached the second round of the presidential election, her political affiliation annihilates her sex.
The majority of politicians and commentators take into account the number of female sexes in all assemblies, demonstrations, fictions, broadcasts, etc., distributing the good and bad points. But the more women are counted, the more they fade away, sex being neither a quality nor a defect, but a banal biological reality. On the contrary of work, ideas, innovations, nerve, ambition, careers, in short acts, which alone make it possible to measure the quality of an individual.
Neofeminism has done everything to turn women away from justice, which has become a patriarchal instrument of domination and a machine for denying women’s voice. Henceforth, it is the medical world which is the object of a new enterprise of destruction by the neo-feminists. The rape complaints filed against ex-gynecologist Chrysoula Zacharopoulou testify to this. That the Secretary of State for La Francophonie is a recognized specialist in endometriosis, that she has worked to have it recognized as a disease does not seem to weigh in the balance of the “violence” she allegedly committed during gynecological consultation .
Rape in all sauces loses its criminal dimension
When a woman goes to a gynecologist and puts her feet in the stirrup, what does she expect? What can she imagine to believe that the smear is a rape? How could she be cared for if no examination is carried out? The women who incriminate the Secretary of State are surprised by the absence of consent; OK, I don’t mind that there are doctors incapable of teaching and uneducated women, but attacking her because she performs an examination when the patient is already provided with a file with many examinations is a matter of abysmal stupidity. The consequence is dramatic: all kinds of rape loses its criminal dimension.
Add to this the political instrumentalization of sexual violence. The hysteria of insubordinate France to unearth rapists in any lustful gaze stops at the gates of their party of Good. We discover the same week that Taha Bouhafs, accused of rape (without filing a complaint, without confrontation with his accusers), had to play the “racism” card to explain his withdrawal when the rape watchman Clémentine Autain was already aware of the charges of sexual violence against him, while Eric Coquerel is the subject of a complaint for heavy flirting dating from 2014 – but suddenly he cannot be resigned. Not like Damien Abad, who is not even indicted. Note the change of speech of the brats of the LFI, who remember the advantage of the presumption of innocence.
I’m a woman and I’m suffocating. I can no longer stand the counts, the sacralization of women’s speech, the sacralization of women’s bodies – from toes to hair -, of the female horizon as the only political path, of women victims of everything, of doctors , bosses, employees, wandering hands, politics, tight-knit dances, swimsuits, diets, bicycles, pandas, sanitary napkins… The vast majority of sex change requests concern teenage girls. More than 70%. Logic. Who still wants to be a woman in this world that glorifies her for political correctness and political interest?