(Finance) – “Planning, designing and implementing an infrastructure considering it for its entire life, in its complete cycle, also envisaging new financing methods. A few days after the presentation of the Industrial Plan 2022/2031the managing director of FS Luigi Ferraris Group returns to one of the topics dealt with in that meeting in the conference organized byUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata and the Court of Auditors, entitled The protection of public finance to develop the country. “Public controls: reforms and spending effectiveness”, an initiative aimed at promoting policies aimed at promoting the spread of the legal-accounting culture “is what FS News reported, the information portal of the Ferrovie dello Stato Group.
The article states that “during the meeting hosted by the Roman University – in line with his training mission – the CEO of Ferrovie dello Stato Luigi Ferraris participated in a panel that had as its object a overview of control and institutional reforms, in which high representatives of Italian politics and civil society took part “.
“A few days ago we presented our Industrial Plan 2022/2031 worth 190 billion euros of investments, which has among its main objectives to finalize these public investments by carrying out the works on schedule and to create an increasingly integrated transport and logistics system, efficient, sustainable. Adequate to the country’s growth needs “, has Ferraris pointed out. A ten-year plan therefore, elaborated in the belief that the temporal perspective is necessary for an academic yearproper planning of activities and effective pursuit of objectives. “But to implement the Plan – explained the FS top manager – one is also needed review of methods and tools, key factors to qualify public spending. Today – continued Ferraris – the relationship with the large implementing bodies, such as our RFI and Anas, uses tools such as program and service contracts, agreements, memoranda of understanding, territorial agreements, which are still affected by an excessive temporal distance between intentions and implementations, between cash and competence, so much so that the responsibility for the result, in the end, is not entirely well focused “.