(Finance) – Assistal, The Association of Confindustria that represents the ESCO, the energy services, facility management and maintenance and management of technological systems, intervened in front of the tenth commission of the Chamber of Deputies in the cycle of auditions on the DL Bollette.
The vice -president with delegation to Esco and Energy Efficiency Services Emanuela Trentin He preliminarily expressed appreciation for the intervention of the government in support of families who face economic difficulties due to the increase in energy costs. However, he noted that the provision presents certain critical issues for the Esco and for the whole sector of energy services companies.
“A first criticality” – Trentin said – “lies in the fact that the measures introduced by the DL bills, in particular those in support of companies, concern only small ones as in the case of thezzeration for a semester of the ASOS component applied to the withdrawn energy that excludes the larger ends. It is useful to consider therefore ” – continued the Vice -President Trentin -” The fundamental role also played by the larger companies that carry out the supply of electricity on behalf of its customers, among which public administrations are above all nod. “
“We believe that structural measures are needed that allow lower exposure of the essus to volatility of energy markets “ – continued Trentin – “and also that the indicators for the revision of prices in public contracts are univocal for all contracts and that best reflect the trends of the markets, in order to allow a correct correlation between the purchase cost of energy carriers and the sale price of energy services provided by the Esco. Finally ” – concluded the Vice -President Trentin -” it is necessary to calibrate the effects of some measures such as ETS 2 and the expected DM Oiert, which could lead to, if not well defined, a cost of cost on the companies of the sector, which although they do not fall Among the producers or thermal energy sellers and are not the owners of the implants managed, they risk having to unjustly endure the charges deriving from the required obligations “.