Dangerous anti-cold: soon the end of over-the-counter sales?

Dangerous anti cold soon the end of over the counter sales

  • News
  • Published on
    updated on


    Reading 2 min.

    Widely considered dangerous for years, major cold treatments are still over-the-counter. As winter approaches, French health authorities are considering finally putting an end to this paradox.

    The delivery of these medications without a medical prescription no longer appears appropriate“, estimated Thursday, in an email to AFP, the National Medicines Safety Agency (ANSM).

    She says she is considering “listing” these treatments, a measure which would take effect immediately and would effectively result in them no longer being available over the counter in pharmacies.

    What these drugs all have in common is that they contain the pseudoephedrine molecule. The main ones are called Actifed Rhume, Dolirhume, Humex Rhume, Nurofen Rhume and Rhinadvil Rhume.

    Available without a prescription in the form of tablets, these treatments – also sold by nasal spray on prescription – aim to decongest and unclog the nose. These are therefore the main medications used against colds.

    Treatments that have been criticized for many years

    But they have been the subject of numerous criticisms for several years, starting with the ANSM itself, because they can cause serious side effects such as strokes and heart attacks.

    The measure envisaged by the medicines agency – relayed in recent weeks by specialized titles such as Le Quotidien du Pharmacien – is, in this respect, the last episode in a long series which has seen it gradually harden its positions in the face of to this family of treatments.

    In 2023, it explicitly advised against their use for the first time. This decision had, for a time, caused sales of anti-cold treatments to decline.

    But these have been rebounding since September, a situation that the ANSM considers particularly worrying “ahead of the winter season” and its procession of diseases.

    Why not ban these drugs altogether? French health authorities regularly explain that their hands are tied by European regulations, which make the withdrawal of an authorization subject to the opinion of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

    Disgruntled pharmacists

    However, it estimated last year that the anti-cold treatments concerned did not present sufficient risks to ban them, even if it imposed new contraindications.

    This opinion is explained by the fact that serious side effects remain very rare. A few are reported each year and, in France, no deaths have been reported.

    The European and French authorities are therefore in disagreement, the latter considering that the risk, even low, is unacceptable given the benign nature of the illness being treated: a simple cold.

    Too many patients remain exposed to serious risks compared to the modest benefits of these medications.“, judges the ANSM.

    This position is in line with the main French learned societies – ENT specialists, general practitioners, pharmacists – who all oppose the use of these drugs.

    On the other hand, it risks offending pharmacists, many of whose representatives believe that such a restriction unfairly reduces the range of medications to be offered to their customers with colds, in a context marked by recurring difficulty in obtaining medical appointments.

    It will become complicated for us to respond to patients’ problems, people will no longer have a doctor and we will no longer be able to advise anything.“, estimates, in the Quotidien du Pharmacien, Béatrice Clairaz-Mahiou, co-president of the French-speaking Society of Officinal Pharmaceutical Sciences (SFSPO).

    But, for other observers, the health authorities have, on the contrary, already been too slow to react.

    Healthcare providers have better things to do than spend time advising patients against a drug that should be withdrawn from the market“, estimated the independent journal Prescrire at the start of the year, seeing in the European decision a “missed opportunity (to) protect patients”.

    dts1