Published: Less than 20 min ago
A student was cheated on the c-essay she bought on the internet.
Then she turned to ARN to get the money back.
“The General Complaints Board did not try the dispute” writes ARN on its website.
The student, who was going to write a c thesis on social work, contacted a company to buy a finished thesis.
She was assured that it would be approved – but when it was submitted to the institution for examination, she discovered that it was not.
“NN’s intention in buying the essay has been to cheat her way to a university degree in the education she was accepted for. This has also been clear to the company. The parties have, among other things, had a discussion that NN risked being suspended from the university by submitting the ordered c-essay,” writes the General Complaints Board on its website.
Demanded the money back
The woman chose to contact ARN to demand the money back as “the essay was not of the quality agreed upon by the parties”.
But the committee was clear in its answer.
“A c thesis is a bachelor’s thesis, that is, an independent, investigative research project at university level that is a prerequisite for obtaining a bachelor’s degree. The board believes that an examination of NN’s demand for repayment would result in the legal order contributing to the enforcement of agreements that aim to mislead a university during examinations and grading, which constitutes the exercise of authority,” writes ARN and continues:
“Appears as offensive”
“Such an arrangement appears offensive and the agreement may therefore be considered contrary to good manners. The agreement is therefore invalid and has no legal effect. Since the agreement is of an improper nature and is invalid and has no legal effect, NN’s claims are not protected by the legal system. The General Complaints Board therefore did not try the dispute but rejected NN’s claim”.