While the use of artificial intelligence systems is seen in many areas, one news came from the Supreme Court. Accordingly, it is planned that the artificial intelligence system will start to serve in the Supreme Court.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WILL IMPROVE FORENSIC QUALITY IN THE JUDICIARY
Within the scope of the Project on Strengthening the Institutional Capacity of the Court of Cassation carried out with the Council of Europe, it is aimed to facilitate the dissemination of current and precedent decisions and to increase the judicial quality with the artificial intelligence-based system.
In accordance with the principle of transparency and accountability, all decisions of the Court of Cassation have been made available to the public since 2015. More than 6 million decisions announced in this process caused difficulties in identifying current and high-guidance decisions.
In order to prevent this, the Supreme Court aims to develop an artificial intelligence-based system, allowing users to easily reach the most up-to-date decisions according to their individual characteristics, in order of importance.
With the commissioning of the system, whose tender process has been completed, it is planned that the precedent decisions on the subject of the search and the decisions made after the law change will be presented to the user as a priority.
In addition, with the system, summaries of 200-300 pages of case files will be prepared, thus accelerating the prosecution and negotiation processes.
The system is scheduled to be commissioned in 2023.
THE PRESIDENT OF THE JUDICIARY AKARCA ANNOUNCED
President of the Court of Cassation Mehmet Akarca said at the 2021 evaluation meeting of the Court of Cassation that artificial intelligence-based systems are used in various countries of the world, and stated that this should also be used in the Supreme Court.
Akarca stated that if the system, which they planned to be free of charge, is established, citizens and lawyers will be able to learn the possibility of winning the case by entering the evidence and data in the system, especially in civil cases, and that they can decide whether or not to file a lawsuit accordingly.
(AA)