Trump’s careless ideas would be less dangerous if he ever retreated from them. At least it doesn’t do that quickly, writes Mika Mäkeläinen, a foreign journalist.
Mika Mäkelälälikälkomaa journalist
When the host of the White House has a matter, everyone else tends to listen to his weighing speeches carefully. But when the US President Donald Trump Open her mouth, even her own assistants, are breathing in their breath.
The hot question is how seriously Trump’s often surprising initiatives should be taken and how they are.
For example, Trump’s bold – and international law -illegal – ideas of Palestinian exile and Gaza to take over the United States in early February were hardly as thoughtful as it sounded fresh.
Trump’s initiative looked systematic because he read it on paper. However, The New York Times is clarifiedthat the Trump administration had not dealt with the feasibility of the idea, even tentatively.
According to Times, Trump’s proposal came as a shock to his assistants and ministers.
It also came as a surprise to Trump’s guest Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to Times, Trump told him about his idea only a moment before the press conference.
Trump’s careless or careless ideas would be less dangerous if he ever retreated from them. At least it is not the case with Trump. Of course, he never admits that he is wrong.
Trump’s assistants have tried explain The best way. Trump yourself has continued In the case of Gaza, in the case of Gaza, for the new heads of state such as the King of Jordan Abdullah for IIwho visited a white house.
If Trump’s ideas are his negotiation tactics, it is the worst in the history of the Middle East. Thus says Researcher of the British Chatham House Research Institute Ahmed Aboudouh.
According to him, Trump endangers Israel and Hamas alert, stains the US reputation in the Middle East and enhances its enemies.
Nevertheless, the Gaza idea was undeniably different. It looks enough for Trump.
In terms of Russian offensive warfare Trump does not give any more stable impression of his snapshot and decision -making.
Trump was asked on Wednesday if he would consider Ukraine as a “equal member” in the peace process. Trump stated that the question was interesting.
An easy question that would have been an easy answer: yes, of course.
Instead, Trump said he shouldn’t have started wars. As if the Ukraine, who was a massive attack in Russia, had other options.
It seems that Trump would not be familiar with the war and its causes.
Great power is not usually derived by whimsical. Political policies and negotiation goals are evaluated as thoroughly and long -term by expertise.
At the Faculty of Law of the University of Harvard have been assessed Trump’s activities and negotiations. Trump has not kept the protocol or foreign tradition and has not wanted the help of experts.
In the negotiations, Trump is estimated to be ready for concessions if the opponent shows him respect and hesitate his ego.
So the other party should flatter Trump.
Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin The telephone conversation on Wednesday showed that Putin knows how to skill.
For example, Putin used the concept of common sense, which Trump combined with his campaign rhetoric. This was found a common tune that Trump glowed in their somepo.
Both Trump and Vice President JD VANCE Since then, they have patched their Ukraine statements.
Trump’s trade policy shows Equally crazy. He threatened the colombia and canceled them. He ordered duties to both Canada and Mexico, but postponed them.
Is sowing chaos wisdom, as the White House, is keen to interpret – the answer may be later.
In any case, permanent uncertainty is the new core of US trade policy, estimates The Washington Post’s Magazine CFO David Lynch.
Uncertainty, on the other hand, is poisonous for investments and economic growth.
That uncertainty now reaches everything that Trump draws his attention.