This is a step forward for the restoration of nature. On Tuesday February 27, the European Parliament gave its final green light to legislation aimed at halting the decline of biodiversity by requiring states to repair damaged ecosystems, despite opposition from a large part of the right.
MEPs validated – narrowly – the agreement reached in November between negotiators from Parliament and member states on this key text of the Green Deal which plans to establish by 2030 reparation measures on 20% of land and EU marine spaces. There still remains formal confirmation from member states before its entry into force.
Restore at least 30% of these habitats in poor condition by 2030
The text requires the Twenty-Seven to introduce restoration measures by 2030 on 20% of land and marine areas at EU level. Specific habitats are listed (wetlands, forests, rivers, underwater meadows, etc.): each State must restore at least 30% of these habitats in poor condition by 2030, with priority to Natura 2000 areas.
The result was very uncertain, the European People’s Party (EPP, right), the first group in Parliament, having called on its elected representatives on Monday to vote against the text, while the far right tabled rejection amendments.
MEPs from the left and center, in unison with environmental NGOs, expressed their relief. After “an aggressive campaign by the EPP” and “despite the sabotage attempts of the far right (…) a victory for the living, the farmers, all Europeans”, reacted the elected environmentalist Marie Toussaint.
Three months before the European elections, conservative elected officials have reaffirmed their distrust of the “Green Deal”, a vast set of environmental regulations condemned to criticism in recent agricultural demonstrations. “We still think that this is a poorly written law (…) We are putting in place additional bureaucratic rules for our farmers” at a time when food production is under pressure, German Manfred insisted on Tuesday Weber, president of the PPE group.
The legislative project emptied of its substance
Under pressure from the right, after a bitter battle, the European Parliament had largely emptied the legislative project of its substance by adopting its negotiating mandate in July.
The conservatives had criticized the mention of an objective – although only indicative – of extending “high diversity” zones (hedges, ponds, fruit trees, etc.) to 10% of agricultural land at EU level. , deleted very early. Above all, Parliament had eliminated the article targeting agricultural land. Of course, this was then reintroduced during talks with the States, but in a watered-down form.
According to the final agreement, States will simply have to aim for “increasing trends” on indicators (butterflies, carbon in the soil, “high diversity” agricultural land).
And the text provides that at least 30% of drained peatlands used in agriculture be restored by 2030 (including at least a quarter by rewetting them), at the risk, according to the right, of weakening yields, despite the possible flexibilities according to States and optional watering for farmers.