The first legislative elections in Lebanon since the start of the crisis, in 2019, were marked by a return of the traditional parties, a breakthrough of protest candidates and strong abstention among Sunnis.
From our correspondent in Beirut,
” My feelings are shared. I no longer know whether I should rejoice at the breakthrough made by certain candidates from the protest movement or be disappointed by the fact that the traditional political class is finally doing well. “. The commentary by Sylva, an architect in her thirties, who participated in the vast anti-power demonstrations, sums up with relevance the result of the legislative elections organized on Sunday May 15 in Lebanon.
This first ballot since the start of the protest, in October 2019, took place without major incidentunder the shadow of measures of enhanced security taken by the army, which deployed tens of thousands of men throughout the territory.
Over the past three years, the Lebanese have made the political class assume the collapse of their purchasing power, the explosion of unemployment, the loss of their bank savings and the generalized impoverishment which now affects 80% of the population. .
This anger, however, did not manifest itself in an electoral tidal wave intended to sweep away the traditional parties, deemed responsible for the misfortunes of the Lebanese.
The residents’ turnout, which stood at 41%, down six points from the 2018 legislative elections, benefited the traditional parties. ” I am disappointed by Michel Aoun for whom I have voted for the past fifteen yearsexplains Tony, former executive of the Free Patriotic Movement (CPL) founded by the Head of State, now led by his son-in-law Gebran Bassil. But I wouldn’t give my vote to other parties or candidates. I prefer to abstain “.
The big political families have a hard life
Despite the resentment of a large part of the Lebanese, the traditional parties, in power or in opposition, and which were thought to be dead two years ago, have pulled out of the game. They will remain in the majority in the new Parliament. The representatives of the great families who have dominated political life for decades, sometimes for more than a century, such as the Joumblatt (Druze), Gemayel, Frangié, el-Khazen (Maronites), were also re-elected.
On an arithmetic level, the loser of these elections is the CPL. With about fifteen elected members out of the 128 deputies in Parliament, Hezbollah’s ally sees its parliamentary group amputated by several seats. It can no longer claim to have the largest Christian bloc.
This title goes to its rival and sworn enemy of Hezbollah, the “Lebanese Forces”, which are undoubtedly the big winners of this election with a bloc of about twenty Christian deputies. Samir Geagea had anticipated this victory on Sunday evening, saying that his party was now the largest Christian formation in the country. Remarks that must be placed in the context of the next presidential election, scheduled for the end of October. The highest state office is traditionally held by a Maronite Christian.
Gebran Bassil also had claimed victory while half-acknowledging that his bloc would come out of this consultation diminished. ” The idea of eliminating the CPL failed, because our bloc will represent all Lebanese regions “, he said. President Aoun’s son-in-law claimed that his party was the victim of a ” war waged by the United States and Israel “.
Hezbollah and Amal take all Shiite seats
Hezbollah, the object of all attention in Lebanon and elsewhere, emerges neither victorious nor defeated from this election. The pro-Iranian party, which has a formidable armed wing to ” defend lebanon against israel will not be able to maintain a majority in Parliament with its allies from other communities. At the same time, he won with the Amal movement the 27 seats reserved for Shiites, which makes them, with his ally, the exclusive representatives of this community. This means that the outgoing Speaker of the House (a position reserved for Shiites), Nabih Berry, will undoubtedly be reappointed.
Another highlight of these elections was the breakthrough of candidates from the protests, who won a dozen seats going to different communities. Their presence in Parliament will be significant, but not sufficient to impose reforms or initiate political change without alliances with traditional parties.
The low turnout of Sunni voters also holds the attention of observers. In Beirut and in the country’s major cities, members of this community turned out to vote in fewer numbers than usual, despite appeals from Dar al-Fatwa, the country’s highest Sunni religious body, and efforts of mobilization deployed by the ambassador of Saudi Arabia, Walid al-Bukhari, returned urgently to Beirut in April.
The sulking of the Sunnis is a sign of solidarity with their leader, former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, pushed into early political retirement by Saudi Arabia in January.
Fragmentation is the main feature of the post-election landscape, raising fears of greater political polarization. This will probably result in institutional blockages, at a time when Lebanon urgently needs an executive power with a large margin of maneuver to adopt the reforms essential to relaunch the economy.