Letter: Put Civic Center options to referendum

Chatham-Kent council has decided to go ahead with a request for proposals for the new “hub” to move the Civic Centre, library and museum into the old Sears building in downtown Chatham. Kudos to them for finding synergies by having all these entities under one roof.

Article content

At Monday’s council meeting (Oct 21), they heard deputations by concerned citizens stating why we aren’t happy with their decision. Of the approximately 19 deputations, 16 were against the move and only three in favor.

Why is that? It’s not because we are against the idea, it’s because we are against having only one option. The current Civic Center building was designed for two more floors. These new floors could house the municipal staff who still work in-house, the third floor could be renovated for new council chambers and the bottom two floors could house the library. The soon-to-be vacant fire hall could be the museum’s new location.

Is it possible?

We don’t know because, as Lauren Anderson stated at the council meeting, administration wasn’t directed by council to look into that option. They were only given direction to look into the Sears building move. Is that how council makes all of their decisions – based on only one option?

Article content

We, the citizens, are asking that administration get the drawings of our current Civic Center renovated with cost estimates. Only then can you compare the two options to find the best possible solution. This should be put to a referendum so the citizens of Chatham-Kent have a say in their future, since it was clear at the meeting Monday that council either isn’t listening to taxpayers, or doesn’t care what we have to say.

If there are savings from keeping the Civic Center in its current location, the money saved could be spent fixing up infrastructure throughout Chatham-Kent.

Sincerely,

Karen Pynenbrouck

Share this article in your social network

pso1