The impact of Metacritic scores on game development is discussed. Famous producers talk about how this platform limits creativity.
In the video game world Metacritic The effect of the scores has been a topic of debate for a long time. Famous game developers Goichi “Suda51” Suda And Shinji Mikami de is among those who think that Metacritic has a negative impact on the game development process. Suda states that Metacritic is overrated in the gaming world and restricts creative processes, while Mikami states that small and interesting games do not receive enough attention compared to big-budget productions.
Metacritic’s Impact on Game Development
Suda51 says that focusing too much on Metacritic scores imposes a certain formula in game development, and games that do not follow this formula lose points. He also adds that big companies are not interested in these games, which are seen as having little marketing value. Mikami argues that the necessity of big-budget games to appeal to a wide audience causes more creative projects to take a backseat.
These criticisms have revived long-standing concerns that Metacritic’s method of summing up game quality with a single score stifles creativity.