From artificial intelligence-based visual production systems midjourneyhas set the bar a little higher with the “V5.1” version that is now available.
midjourney, in use for a long time V4 It was truly breathtaking with its version, and recently sent the V5 version, which brought great improvements. You can handle what you type or in other words the commands you give incredibly well. artificial intelligence-based content production system that makes visual The “v5.1” version has recently been released for this and the quality has been taken one level higher. Much criticized in V5 version and V4 version “hand/finger problems“The company that solved it to a large extent, especially the new version “The images presented in v5.1 version are more consistent, sharp and beautiful. The new version is easier to use and now responds to instructions more precisely/accurately. We’ve also added a “RAW” mode to give our power users more creative control.” its description made. As you can see, the company is constantly raising the bar for the V6 version, which is not yet known. “probably will completely obscure the difference between real and virtual” has an expectation. There is a serious usage fee after the trial version. midjourney directly to the service You can find it here. You can see some sample photos produced with the new version in the Twitter post below:
— Nathan Lands (@NathanLands) May 4, 2023
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED
Midjourney has also come to the fore with a copyright lawsuit in recent months. DALL-E, Stable Diffusion And midjourney Artificial intelligence-based systems such as AI collect and analyze the photos / images on the internet on a large scale and visualize what people write through them. That’s why the established infrastructures copy the styles of designers and photographers without permission, but these systems also have some bad sides in creating inappropriate content. In this regard, a step was taken a short time ago that could have great consequences. three artists (Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz) stable diffusion And midjourney litigation against DeviantArt alongside Midjourney with Stability AI behind their systems had opened.
Artificial intelligence tools developed by these organizationswithout the permission of the original artists“Education on five billion images collected over the internet is thought to violate the rights of millions of artists. Because stable diffusion And midjourney Monetization is earned from the content created on systems such as Unfortunately, original artists cannot receive a share of this income.. Especially the artists who develop a unique style, take a big hit from this situation, and a serious loss of income is experienced with many copy designs. Seen as a step towards making AI fair and ethical for all the consequences of the case could seriously change the future of systems. As a result of this lawsuit, the owners of artificial intelligence systems, may have to pay a share to the designer and photographer whose style he copied. Even if this means an impossible result for the systems (for example, if the visual records are not kept well), even the use of the established commercial systems can be cancelled.