(Finance) – “The new list of professionals who carry out sales operations is yet another register that penalizes young people”. Matteo De Lise denounces it, President of the National Union of Young Chartered Accountants and Accounting Experts.
“To access the list – explains De Lise – it is necessary to submit an application for registration not to the professional Orders of belonging, but to the president of the competent Court, who will evaluate the request with a committee. The problem is that it will be necessary to prove that one is in possession of qualifications and documents suitable for demonstrating the specific technical competence of the applicant, i.e. having carried out no less than ten roles as a sales delegate in the previous five years; to be in possession of the title of specialist lawyer in forced execution law and to have participated in schools or advanced training courses. It seems to us that once again young professionals are the most penalized. Why not include experience alongside your dominus as a requirement? Registration in the list – concludes the number one of the Ungdcec – then needs confirmation, for which the continuous updating envisaged by the assignment of the tasks will not be enough, but the professionals will be obliged to follow specific training courses , we don’t know if for a fee”.
Alessio Saraullo (national councilor of Ungdcec), explains that the norm “provides for a maximum ceiling of assignments attributed to the individual professional which cannot exceed 10 percent of those entrusted by the Office and by the individual judge. Considering that it is forbidden for professionals to register in more than one list, how can the necessary specialization be guaranteed to guarantee the rapidity of the procedures? But above all, why should enrollment in more than one list be a practice to be hindered even with regulatory provisions? It is not clear what prejudice it would cause to justice”.
For Robert Gennari (College of Arbitrators of the Union), it is legitimate to ask “what will become of the delegated professional who works in smaller courts who cannot, even if he wants to, have ten offices in a five-year period. We cannot fail to see that once again in a competitive reality open to specialized professionals there is a disparity in protection, due to the strength of the category representatives: there is the figure of the lawyer specializing in forced execution law but not an equivalent for the others Orders. Everything goes in the direction of making the work of the professionals in charge of improving the service to the public function more and more complex”.