A copyright lawsuit has been filed for AI-based visual production systems Stable Diffusion and Midjourney. The consequences can be severe.
DALL-E, Stable Diffusion and midjourney As you know, artificial intelligence-based systems like 2022 made a lot of noise, and they are still on the agenda. Systems that collect and analyze photos / images on the Internet on a large scale and visualize what people write on them, they are generally liked, but they have many aspects that attract reaction. For example, these systems copy the styles of designers and photographers without permission, but also these systems have some drawbacks in creating inappropriate content. In this regard, a step has recently been taken that could have great consequences. three artists (Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz) stable diffusion and midjourney litigation against DeviantArt alongside Midjourney with Stability AI behind their systems opened.
Artificial intelligence tools developed by these organizationswithout the permission of the original artists“Education on five billion images collected over the internet is thought to violate the rights of millions of artists. because stable diffusion and midjourney Monetization is earned from the content created on systems such as Unfortunately, original artists cannot receive a share of this income.. Especially the artists who develop a unique style, take a big hit from this situation, and a serious loss of income is experienced with many copy designs.
Seen as a step towards making AI fair and ethical for all the consequences of the case could seriously change the future of systems. As a result of this lawsuit, the owners of artificial intelligence systems, may have to pay a share to the designer and photographer whose style he copied. Even if this means an impossible result for the systems (for example, if the visual records are not kept well), even the use of the established commercial systems can be cancelled.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED
The situation, which creates big question marks about share sharing, seems vital for the future of the art world. Because at this stage It seems that digital artists will soon be unable to generate income with their works. There are many people who produce the work of an artist in seconds with artificial intelligence and sell it at a very low price because it does not put any effort into it, bringing the market down.
About this last week of the European Union to control and use systems It turned out that he wanted to set some long-term rules. While it is thought that those who break the rules, which are still not fully clear, will be punished, those who produce these systems are asked to take on a more transparent structure.
European Union At the same time, he believes that the artificial intelligence models fed with millions of photographs for visual production should be limited to what can be produced and the outputs should be examined in detail in order not to abuse the technology. These technologies do not seem to be very easy to manage, but Some serious legal steps are definitely planned for 2023.