The pandemic would have indeed started in the Wuhan market

The debate has raged since the start of the pandemic between experts, who are still seeking almost three years later to elucidate the mystery of the origin of the virus. The first study is a geographical analysis showing that the first cases detected in December 2019 were concentrated around the market. The second is a genomic analysis of the virus from the first cases, showing that the virus is very unlikely to have circulated widely in humans before November 2019.

One of the authors of these studies himself, Michael Worobey, a virologist at the University of Arizona, had signed a letter in 2021 calling for serious consideration of the hypothesis of a leak from a laboratory in Wuhan.

But the data analyzed since “made me evolve, to the point that today I also think it’s just not plausible that the virus was introduced in any way other than through the trade in animals at the market from Wuhan”he said at a press conference.

Kristian Andersen, of the Scripps Research Institute and also a co-author of these studies, said: “Have we disproved the lab leak theory? No. Will we ever be able to? No. But I think it’s important to understand that there are possible scenarios, and probable ones. And that possible doesn’t mean equally likely.”

No animal identified

The first study analyzed the places of residence of the first 155 cases identified in December 2019. The researchers showed that these cases were concentrated around the Wuhan market, unlike those recorded in the following months, which coincided with high-density neighborhoods, showing the spread of the virus.

Moreover, among the cases studied, people not directly linked to the market lived closer to it than those working there or having recently visited it. This indicates that they were probably infected due to their proximity to this place.

The researchers also analyzed samples taken from the market in January 2020, for example from a cage or carts. Their analyzes show that the samples positive for Sars-Cov-2 were concentrated in the south-west of the market, precisely where live animals were sold (including raccoon dogs, a species of badger, foxes, etc.). The animal that would have acted as an intermediary between bats, carriers of coronavirus, and humans has not been identified.

Better understand to avoid other pandemics

The second study is based on the analysis of the genome of the virus that infected these very first cases. She concludes that two lineages of the virus, A and B existed before February 2020. And that these two lineages likely resulted from two separate human transmission events, both at the Wuhan market.

Previous studies had suggested that the B line had evolved from the A line. Going forward, the scientists emphasize that it is important to understand where the animals sold in the Wuhan market come from, in order to minimize future risks.

If gray areas therefore remain, the researchers underlined that the information available on the beginnings of this pandemic was in fact very detailed. “There is this general feeling that there is no information that can tell us anything about the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic”commented Kristian Andersen. “That’s just wrong.”

China has regularly been accused of withholding information or failing to cooperate fully with international investigations. Understanding how this pandemic started is crucial to help prevent similar future events, and potentially save millions of lives. “Pandemics don’t require blame, but they do require understanding.”concluded Kristian Andersen.